C4B Practice
Browse by Chapter
#73Chapter 11 — Influencer & Partnership Marketing
I need to review submitted influencer content against the campaign brief. Compare the two documents below and flag any issues.

**CAMPAIGN BRIEF:**
[Paste the brief or its mandatory section]

**SUBMITTED CONTENT:**
[Paste the creator's submitted caption, script, or content text]

**Check for:**
1. **Unapproved claims** — Any statements not present in the approved claims list. Flag the exact phrase and note what the approved language should be.
2. **Missing mandatory elements** — Any required talking points, hashtags, or messaging that's absent.
3. **Disclosure compliance** — Is the required disclosure present, properly formatted, and in the right location?
4. **Prohibited claims** — Any language from the "Claims You Cannot Make" list, or close variations.
5. **Brand guideline violations** — Product name misspelling, incorrect hashtags, competitor mentions.

For each flag, rate severity:
- 🔴 **Must fix** — Legal/compliance risk, unapproved claims, missing disclosure
- 🟡 **Should fix** — Off-brief messaging, missing talking point
- 🟢 **Suggestion** — Optimization opportunity, not a requirement

If no issues found, confirm: "Content approved — all mandatory elements present, no compliance concerns."
Claude for Marketers
Claude for Marketers

These prompts are excerpts from the book. Get the full collection with explanations and use cases.

Get the Book